Skip to main content
SpanVor

SpanVor Industrial Data Atlas / Tampa Bay

Tampa Bay industrial, split between two strong cores.

Tampa Bay’s industrial map is not a simple downtown-to-suburb gradient. Pinellas carries the largest property count, Hillsborough carries far more known building area, and Pasco and Hernando extend the growth edge northward.

Industrial property records
25,1214-county market definition
Small-bay property records
22,600Inventory classification, not availability
Active pipeline minimum
51active small-bay intersection unavailable
Identified housing pipeline
31,32429,541 current + 1,783 planned

What stands out

The useful story begins below the metro average.

Pinellas and Hillsborough together contain almost nine in ten tracked market records, yet they represent different physical products and operating environments. That distinction is more useful than treating Tampa Bay as one average industrial location.

01

Pinellas leads in property count

Its dense, mature industrial fabric produces the market’s largest tracked property base and more than 10,500 small-bay records.

02

Hillsborough leads in building area

Known industrial building area in Hillsborough is nearly twice Pinellas, showing why count and square footage answer different questions.

03

The northward growth edge matters

More than 31,000 identified current and planned housing units add demand context, especially where Pasco and Hernando connect to the core.

County inventory

The physical base behind the market.

Property records are not one-for-one buildings or available suites. Building area and tenant observations help reveal the operating scale behind each county count.

RankCountyProperty recordsSmall-bay recordsKnown building SFTenant records
1PinellasFIPS 1210311,82810,588210.4M32,517
2HillsboroughFIPS 1205710,7959,840405.4M28,037
3PascoFIPS 121012,1051,82534.2M4,203
4HernandoFIPS 120533933478.6M708

What comes next

Supply evidence and demand context, kept honest.

Measured active minimum of 51 previously reviewed current/planned projects. The later 115-identity recovery cohort remains useful, nonadditive project evidence but is held outside active supply pending a uniform lifecycle and physical-project identity review.

51 industrial projects in the active minimum
48 are explicitly current and 3 explicitly planned; any remainder stays in the market-specific measured estimate without a final split.
Active small-bay count unavailable
100 reviewed small-bay identities remain useful product evidence, but have not been safely intersected with the certified active lifecycle cohort.
31,324 identified housing units
29,541 under development plus 1,783 planned. Housing is practical demand context for local operators; it is not a direct bay-absorption forecast.

Held outside the active total: 115 later identities remain available for audit rather than being quietly added to the headline.

Inventory coverage

Enough scale to be useful. Clear limits where it matters.

21,734 of 25,121 records carry usable building area, or 86.5%. Tenant observations cover 13,306 property records.

Download and cite

A market profile built to be reused.

The files keep existing inventory, industrial development evidence and residential demand context in separate rows with their own dates and labels.

Tampa Bay public aggregate.
Exact project records, addresses, ownership, contacts and source documents remain outside the public file.

Download CSVDownload JSONDownload chart

SpanVor. “Tampa–St. Petersburg–Clearwater Industrial Market.” SpanVor Industrial Data Atlas, inventory through 2026-08-21; development evidence through 2026-08-21; housing evidence through 2026-09-02. https://spanvor.com/markets/tampa